Benutzer Diskussion:Adam78

Szia, Adam78, und vielen Dank für die interwiki-Aktualisierung bei Szarvas! Ich korrigiere normal nicht auf Benutzerseiten, aber weil du's extra gesagt hast, habe ich ein paar Kleinigkeiten verbessert. Dein Deutsch ist wirklich sehr gut - biztos hogy jobb mint az én Magyarom, aber das bedeutet leider nicht viel :-(. Viele Grüße T.a.k. 21:22, 20. Jun 2005 (CEST)

Füst zu Fust?

Hallo Adam78,

warum hast du denn in den Kategorien von Milán Füst aus Füst Fust gemacht? Gibt es da eine sortiererische Begründung? Vielen Dank. Tiontai 09:13, 4. Aug 2005 (CEST)

Hello Adam78,

ok. I understand and can accept that. Good luck anyhow, its fantastic that you support the german wikipedia. Would be happy to understand more magyar nyelv, but I am really bad at that. Tiontai 20:40, 4. Aug 2005 (CEST)

Ibolya Csák

Hi, Adam, could you please try to get some additional information about this sportswomen, especially her place of death. Regards, -- Hunding 01:23, 11. Feb 2006 (CET)

Venezuela

Hast du Lust dich am Artikel Venezuela zu betätigen, indem du die Informationen aus der englischen Wikipedia übersetzt. Wenn ja, dann melde dich auf der Diskussionsseite von Venezuela. P.S. Die englische Wikipedia ist eine wahre Fundgrube. Viele Grüße!! Deutschlandartikelveränderer 15:45, 21. Feb 2006 (CET)

Du wurdest auf der Seite Vandalismusmeldung gemeldet (2024-05-09T12:51:01+00:00)

Hallo Adam78, Du wurdest auf der o. g. Seite gemeldet. Weitere Details kannst du dem dortigen Abschnitt entnehmen. Wenn die Meldung erledigt ist, wird sie voraussichtlich hier archiviert werden.
Wenn du zukünftig nicht mehr von diesem Bot informiert werden möchtest, trage dich hier ein. – Xqbot (Diskussion) 14:51, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

Hi Adam78, you've edit warred at Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung [1] which is not acceptable. If a user reports you and you don't think their report is correct, you could have just written there.

It should have been explained to you earlier, but as @Toni Müller explained [2] you are wrong about comparing Frivaldszky with pages like Müller (Familienname). While Frivaldszky is a disambiguation page (and therefore in the category Kategorie:Begriffsklärung), the other articles you mentioned are actual articles about family names (providing information about history, distribution of the name etc.) and therefore in the category Kategorie:Familienname. Please don't change Frivaldszky again.

Assuming you are not continuing the edit war I'm going to lift the partial block I set in order to stop you from reverting at Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung. --Johannnes89 (Diskussion) 15:13, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

@Johannnes89: I don't really care about whether you keep or remove my block; all I care about is consistence and an unbiased adherence to reality. Germans are known for such things in general and I appreciate this feature of the German-language Wikipedia in particular, one of the most serious and most committed Wikipedias overall. I hope you don't mean to disappoint me. If you check out surnames in Kategorie:Familienname, you will find several names (e.g. Afzelius, Ahlefeldt, Acciaiuoli) that have no section about origin, history, or meaning. When there is any background provided, it's often only a very brief sentence about the nationality, see e.g. Adolphus, Abay, Aichinger, Aamodt, Aitken, Alexandrow, Albinus, Alanson, Abs, Acosta, Alberti, or Alain. Now I've added the amount of information to Frivaldszky that should make it qualify for the latter type. Can it be moved to Kategorie:Familienname now? Adam78 (Diskussion) 15:53, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

Adolphe has a (short) section about the origin. And all of the other pages you mentioned are considerably longer than this disambiguation page Frivaldszky, which can be compared to disambiguation pages like Abagnale, Abajew or Abakumow.

Don't move it to Kategorie:Familienname without achieving consensus at Diskussion:Frivaldszky (which seems unlikely) or discuss it as a general issue at Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiProjekt Begriffsklärungsseiten. --Johannnes89 (Diskussion) 16:00, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

@Johannnes89: I'm sorry to see you're not taking Wikipedia as seriously as it would deserve in my opinion. I cannot promise I won't move it to Kategorie:Familienname thanks to the 12 counter-examples I listed. Existing consensus is reflected in the actual usage, which you cannot deny. Adam78 (Diskussion) 16:07, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

Consider this a one time warning: If you change Frivaldszky again without achieving consensus with the other authors first, you will be blocked for edit warring. --Johannnes89 (Diskussion) 16:09, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

@Johannnes89: Consensus has been already achieved as demonstrated by Adolphus, Abay, Aichinger, Aamodt, Aitken, Alexandrow, Albinus, Alanson, Abs, Acosta, Alberti, and Alain. You're acting against consensus if you disregard all these, even if you have the power to block and unblock people. Adam78 (Diskussion) 16:25, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)

Those pages are different to the one you want to change, I've linked multiple disambiguation pages above disproving your point (and there are countless more). If you don't think that's the case you'll need to discuss this, as required by our local Wikipedia:Edit-War rule, which requires you to find consensus once your edit gets reverted. Your edit has been reverted three times already [3], any further change by you without consensus will lead to a block.

There is no point in discussing it with me on your user talk page, as I'm just an admin trying to stop this edit war. You'll need to find consensus at Diskussion:Frivaldszky or Wikipedia Diskussion:WikiProjekt Begriffsklärungsseiten, otherwise your desired change is not allowed. --Johannnes89 (Diskussion) 16:32, 9. Mai 2024 (CEST)